Permitting reform: A balancing act between progress and protection, and its impact on design professionals

When we think of the future, we often imagine a cleaner, more sustainable world powered by renewable energy. However, this dream remains elusive unless we address the bureaucratic hurdles that slow down our progress. Today, there is an ongoing debate on Capitol Hill surrounding permitting reform and there are implications for design professionals to consider.

The Lower Energy Costs Act (LECA), which seeks to streamline permitting approval for domestic energy production, has found support from both Republicans and Democrats. The Act’s proponents argue that easing the permitting process will promote transmission and renewable energy infrastructure, ultimately combating climate change. However, the road to reform is not without its challenges. Some lawmakers, environmental groups, clean energy industry representatives, and frontline communities fear that changing the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) could weaken environmental protections and erode public trust. These groups believe that delays in renewable energy projects stem from the complex interplay of federal, state, and local politics, transmission connectivity issues, and misaligned investor-owned utility incentives.

Concerned stakeholders propose an alternative approach:

  1. Tackling transmission bottlenecks and grid connectivity;
  2. Improving NEPA procedures by swiftly disbursing dedicated IRA funds ($750 million) to build administrative and personnel capacity; and
  3. Enhancing inter-agency coordination to streamline processes (e.g., FAST 41).

As the LECA moves to the Senate for consideration, design professionals should stay alert to this unfolding story. The proposed policies could lead to tighter project timelines and increased expectations, potentially resulting in higher risks of design errors, omissions, or oversights and, ultimately, greater professional liability exposure. In addition, alterations to NEPA and other energy policies may demand changes to environmental regulations and industry standards. Design professionals must stay informed and adapt to ensure compliance and avoid potential liability risks.

Lastly, the focus on expanding domestic fossil-based energy infrastructure brings with it increased scrutiny on the environmental impact and sustainability of these projects. In a climate change sensitive world, design professionals must navigate these challenges to minimize their liability risks, but also be aware of reputational risks in the context of increased social awareness around developments that protect natural resources and minimize pollution impacts.

As we strive for a more sustainable future, it’s crucial to strike a balance between streamlining permitting processes and preserving environmental protections. By staying informed and adapting to the ever-evolving landscape of permitting reform, NEPA, and energy policies, design professionals can play a pivotal role in shaping a world powered by clean, renewable energy.

Leave a Reply

Create a website or blog at

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: